1. Starting from the assumption that you agree some basic level of good education for all students is beneficial for society (clarify if I'm wrong), it makes sense to work on lifting the bottom end (in addition to anything else) so that some students aren't shafted.
1a. So why not focus on reducing the ever-increasing amounts of administration? If there are some schools (charter, public, other) that don't have this issue, then it must be a solvable problem. If all schools have this issue, why even bring it up?
1b. How do you fairly grade/rate bad teachers so they can be replaced? In a way that isn't susceptible to politics, favoritism, or other issues.
|
